taylorbarstow.com

Surprised and Excited

I wanted to watch Michelle Obama’s speech last night because I was curious to see how she decided to portray herself, her husband, and her family. Obama is, relatively speaking, unknown to many of our nation’s voters. Further, his background falls far outside the American norm. All this has given significant fuel to the Republicans, who have painted Obama as nothing more than a sweet talking celebrity out of touch with core American values.

So I expected Michelle Obama to communicate her family’s values on her terms. But I was surprised and delighted to find something I didn’t expect: as a speaker, Michelle Obama rivals her husband! Her passion, her thoughtfulness, and her candor all shone brightly last night. She delivered the kind of speech rarely seen from most mainstream politicians these days—let alone from politicians’ partners. (Indeed, I would argue that we won’t see anything as inspirational from the Republicans during their convention.)

Let’s hope that, as Michelle put it (I’m paraphrasing here), we can come together as a country and listen to our hopes this time around, rather than our fears! If we can make this happen, then maybe, finally, we can get out from under the thumb of corporate America and set our own agenda for once. A big thank you to Michelle Obama—your speech thrilled and inspired me.

The Great Filter

My friend Jeff just came over for dinner and brought up NBC’s role in the Olympics.  NBC controls which events to televise, and thus which events most Americans know about.  As an example, the network has seriously emphasized beach volleyball this year.  Meanwhile, sports like crew have received litte coverage.  Show me some fucking table tennis!

In fact, NBC’s influence goes beyond scheduling.  According to Jeff, NBC played a huge role in moving the IOC to ditch one or two track cycling events and replace them with BMX.

We see the same phenomenon in the news media.  Newspapers, news networks, and news radio stations have complete control over which news we get to hear about.  This is no subtle role! It fundamentally affects our understanding of the world.

Adrian and I agree—there must be a better way. But what is it? Even with on demand television (for example) or the Internet, there is some provider deciding what is available.

There is at least one answer, at least one unbiased group that can provide unfiltered content.  What is this great, omnipotent, honest source?  It’s you; it’s me.  You, me, and everyone else who is connected to the Internet.

Can it be done? Would the world accept a radically different mechanism for information distribution? Am I (is anyone) brave enough to try? Open questions, for now. I’ll tell you this: it is most definitely an intriguing challenge.